Separation Agreement Neutral Reference Clause

A mailing clause generally prohibits a former employee from approaching current employees with new job opportunities. So now is not the time to encourage other employees – Jerry Maguire style – to join your new company, which is competing in the same industry and market as your former employer. Sometimes this clause also prohibits former employees from recruiting customers and customers or hiring suppliers in a way that changes their business relationship with the former employer. What exactly do you do among these types of clauses (or not do it)? Let`s look at them looking for the other so that you can keep your behavior in line with your agreement. Generally speaking, a “neutral reference” means that a former employer who is asked to provide a reference only provides and verifies some very basic information about your position, for example.B. date of employment and positions held. These are quite common and are generally not considered not to be a defect and, in fact, many employers usually only give negative or neutral references, although there are exceptions to this rule. But a neutral reference is certainly a better option than a negative one and, as far as possible, it should be confirmed in severance pay interviews. It`s official: you`ve just signed your redundancy contract. On the other hand, you probably received something you really wanted, like a cash payment or a deal to get a neutral reference for potential employers. Can your former employer denigrate you? When the employer designs a severance pay agreement, this clause normally deals only with your denigration of the employer.

But you can and should negotiate for mutual non-remuneration. The way an employer talks about you may slightly hurt your future job prospects. Therefore, you should protect yourself from negative comments your employer might make about you, either by negotiating a mutual non-remuneration or by introducing a neutral reference provision into your agreement. We`d love to tell you about your departure agreement, whether you`ve already signed it or are still thinking about it. Please contact our office to speak to one of our employment specialists. In his third complaint against the company, Furst claimed that Manion`s comments about his trial history were contrary to the settlement agreement. The company defended the action, arguing that it was not a “reference” since the application did not come from a potential employer. In the alternative, Manion`s statements were not contrary to the settlement agreement, since that agreement only specifically fixed what was specifically fixed (name, rank and salary) and could not be provided (reference to dismissal or dismissal).

Manion was free to include additional information as long as it did not indicate termination or dismissal. The court accepted and dismissed Furst`s claim. Note that what some agreements call “secret,” others may call “confidentiality.” In case of use in this sense, the confidentiality provisions refer to this specific agreement not to disclose the agreement. However, employers more often discuss the confidentiality of all information obtained by a former employee through an employment relationship. . . .

Comments are closed.